Study was carried out in accordance with the ethical principles of Nodules and penile sensation were questioned and evaluated. Medical treatment for ED, penile deformity, curvature, fibrotic Of postoperative history, physical examination, erectile function and cosmetic appearance. Sexual intercourse and masturbation were banned forĦ weeks postoperatively. Wraps were applied to all patients and removed on postoperativeĭay three. Inserted in all patients following the operation and then removed The 2.0 andģ.0 absorbable sutures were preferred for ligation of arteries and Of hematoma, tunical leakage was evaluated by establishing anĪrtificial erection with intracorporal saline injection. Was preferred in all surgical operations. Physical examination, and radiological findings, intraoperativeĪll patients were urgently operated. Patients" demographicĬharacteristics (age, etiologic factors), clinical symptoms, Patients who had a tunical tearĭetected on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),īut surgical exploration did not reveal a tunical tear wereĬonsidered as having false penile fracture. Theĭiagnosis of false penile fracture was made based on theĭetection of injury to the artery, vein, ligament and nonspecificĭartos structures that caused bleeding other than the tear in theĬorpus cavernosum during surgical exploration. Of the operative reports were evaluated retrospectively. Were diagnosed with a false penile fracture after the examination September 2019, the medical records of 8 (7.9%) patients who With a prediagnosis of penile fracture between January 2006 and Local ethics committee approval was obtained prior to study Operated on with a prediagnosis of penile fracture and thenĭiagnosed with a false penile fracture in the light of the literature. Present the clinical and operative results of 8 patients who were In this study, in the light of the literature, it was aimed to Performing unnecessary surgical interventions, and successful In these cases, morbidity can be avoided by refraining from Preoperativeĭetection of false penile fracture cases bears great importance. However, history and physical examination can be inaccurate inġ5% of patients with suspected penile fracture. The characteristic symptoms of a penile fracture includeĮcchymosis and swelling of the penile body following aĬracking sound, penile pain, and immediate detumescence. This condition is called a false penile fracture and amounts toĥ-52% of clinically diagnosed penile fractures. Secondary to the rupture of the superficial veins of the penis. There may be penile ecchymosis or hematoma In some patients, no tear is observed in the tunica albugineaĭuring surgery. May be consequences such as erectile dysfunction, chronic pain,Ĭorporal fibrosis and penile curvature in the long term Timely repair of the tear in the tunica albuginea. Studies with larger patient seriesĪ true penile fracture is the occurrence of a tunical tearĪs a result of blunt trauma to the penis, usually during sexual Surgery should still be the first-line treatment option in suspected patients. False penile fracture can be treatedĬonservatively without the need for surgery. Penile curvature, and sensory disturbances were detected in any patient.Ĭonclusion: It is difficult to distinguish a false penile fracture from true penile fracture clinically or radiologically. Wound site infection developed in 1 patient postoperatively. There were no intraoperative complications. Superficial dorsal vein injury was detected in 6, and nonspecific dartos bleeding wasĭetected in 2 patients. Performed by degloving the penis from the circumcision line. The most commonĮtiological factors were as follows: sexual intercourse in 6, masturbation in 1, and manual bending of the erect penis in 1 patient. The most common complaints were penile swelling and ecchymosis. Results: Mean age of the patients was 39.12 (28-54) years. Patients" demographic characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. Material and Methods: Data of 8 patients who were diagnosed with a false penile fracture between January 2006 and September 2019 were retrospectivelyĪnalyzed. The clinical and operative results of 8 patients who were operated on with a prediagnosis of penile fracture and then diagnosed with a false penile fracture. In this study, in the light of the literature, it was aimed to present False penile fracture, on the other hand, is aĬondition that presents with similar clinical features and can be treated conservatively. Abstract Objective: Penile fracture is one of the urological emergencies that require early surgical intervention.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |